'If the dogs were not being fought when seized, there are no evidences of dog fighting." Not having access to a police report or a grand jury indidment we really don't know what if any evidence the procecution had. I don't believe law enforcement has to personally see this crime to have probable cause. For all we know there may have been particapants/witness prepared to testify. The physical condition of the dogs ie. evidence of fighting would be admissible ans germane to the case. The historical relavence of these dogs would be more of neg to the defendant as that would contribute to the probablity that these were in fact fighting dogs. I'm sure the defence would argue that it's perfectly normal to have 50 pits chained out in a yard. One never know when a buch of tolders may come by needing to play kissy face with these deligtful human loving pets. :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: