Comment to 'Latest news on Michael Vick's dogs'
  • [quote=Platz]Actually, when he was charged the state HAD TO seize the dogs as the dogs were physical evidence ofthe alledged crime. I'm wondering how they legaly could distroy evidence on a crime that was not ejudicated? Seems to me that the person that signed the oder to distroy these dogs has crimminal culpiblity.[/quote] When I said touched, I meant put down. Of course they have to take them, but I hope they get the hell sued out of them for putting them down. ~Cindy