I didn't even click on the link because I've recognized the title, since I had already read it before and I know it was written by Jan, for whose opinion I have very little respect, for a few reasons. While he does raise some good points in his article, it's hard to take any of it seriously since it's obvious that not enough research went into it and that Jan himself simply doesn't know enough about history itself, not to mention his lack of knowledge about dogs, breeds, types or their origins and history. The article is a waste of time at best and an entertaining read at worst.