[quote="LeeRobinson"] Nak, first, get your quotes right. Your box is around the wrong material (your words and not mine). Second,...and read this carefully to see if you can be enlightened... [blockquote]Nope, I was not CROSSBREEDING huge differance and you damned well know it.[/blockquote] There is a huge difference. Crossbreeding and ADMITTING IT has no effect on any pure breed...because the honest breeder is not putting his dogs back into the "pure" population. So, it only effects the breeders product and the the "pure" breed's gene pool. HOWEVER, to breed "working" dogs without working them DOES RUIN the breed...because then the genes from non working dogs are bred back into the "working breed's" genes...resulting is lesser capable dogs for future generations. You are distroying their purpose. Again, it is better for everyone to think you are a fool than it is for you to open your mouth and prove it. You should just admit you know nothing of working dogs. Do you honestly think show bred huskies can pull a sled as well as dogs used daily in Alaska for such tasks? Which dog is the REAL husky?...for the true husky was bred to work, therefore, the real huskies today are NOT the ones running in a circle with their handlers that prance around a ring in sandles and flower dresss. No, they are only shadows of what once was....claiming great fame from their working ancestors; meanwhile, the true huskies have handlers dressed for the ice cold and working lifestyles...while they eat musher's meat in the frozen land.[/quote] Lee, even though I believe that you should substantiate your claims with actually putting some working titles on your dogs and with health testing, I TOTALLY agree with your quote above!!!!!! Particularly the breeding working dogs that don't work part! I had high hopes for my female CC for PP and a ring sport, but because her nerve was not what I wanted in a working dog, we spayed her. She is a great guard dog but not a PP dog! ALV