Breeders

  • More
Followers
Add new...
 
 
·
Added a discussion to , Breeders
The Politics of Dog Shows: Influences on and Canine In the glittering world of dog shows, where pedigrees are paraded and ribbons flutter, a complex interplay of politics, aesthetics, and tradition shapes the destiny of our beloved canine companions. The United States, home to prestigious events like the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show, has witnessed both celebration and controversy within this realm. In this essay, we delve into the multifaceted dynamics of dog shows, their impact on breeders, and the fascinating evolution of dog morphology. Origins and Purpose of Dog Shows Dog trace their lineage to mid-19th century England, where breed enthusiasts gathered to exhibit their prized Setters, Pointers, and other gun dogs4. Initially, these events aimed to celebrate the functional qualities of various breeds—traits that made them adept hunters, herders, or guardians. Judges evaluated dogs based on their working abilities, temperament, and adherence to breed standards. However, over time, the focus shifted. Aesthetic considerations gained prominence, and the quest for the "perfect" show dog intensified. The American Kennel Club (AKC), founded in 1884, became the custodian of breed standards, wielding considerable influence over the dog show circuit. The Politics Within the Ring 1. The Quest for Titles and Prestige Dog breeders and handlers vie for coveted titles—Best in Show, Group Winners, and Breed Champions. These accolades translate into prestige, stud fees, and enhanced marketability for breeding stock. Judges' decisions are subjective, influenced by personal preferences, breed trends, and even political affiliations. 2. Breeder Influence and Lobbying Behind the scenes, breeders engage in subtle lobbying. They network, attend social events, and curry favor with influential judges. The AKC's Breeder of Merit program recognizes those who adhere to ethical breeding practices, but the allure of ribbons sometimes tempts breeders to compromise health and genetic diversity. 3. The Inbreeding Dilemma Inbreeding, a common practice in the show-dog world, aims to fix desirable traits. However, intensive inbreeding can lead to a genetic bottleneck, amplifying deleterious mutations. Show dogs often share common ancestors, resulting in a higher risk of hereditary diseases. The pursuit of exaggerated features—such as brachycephalic (short-nosed) breeds—exacerbates health issues2. Impact on Breed Morphology 1. The Beauty Paradox Show standards prioritize aesthetics—coat texture, color, ear shape, and tail carriage. While this enhances breed uniformity, it also perpetuates exaggerated features. Bulldogs with pushed-in noses struggle to breathe; Dachshunds' elongated spines invite disc problems. The quest for a "perfect" silhouette sometimes sacrifices well-being. 2. The Vanishing Talents Historically, each breed served a purpose: Greyhounds chased game, Border Collies herded sheep, and Newfoundlands rescued drowning sailors. Yet, as show dogs diverge from their working roots, talents fade. Retrievers retrieve less, and Pointers point less. The loss of functional abilities is a silent tragedy. 3. The Designer Dog Debate Designer breeds—Labradoodles, Cockapoos, and Goldendoodles—emerged from crossbreeding. While some aim for healthier, hypoallergenic pets, others exploit trends. Wally Conron, creator of the Labradoodle, regrets opening a Pandora's box. These hybrids, once novel, now face health issues and unpredictable traits. Conclusion: A Balancing Act Dog shows remain a double-edged sword. They celebrate breed diversity yet perpetuate health risks. As breeders, judges, and enthusiasts gather under the spotlight, they must recalibrate their priorities. Canine welfare, genetic diversity, and functional abilities should reclaim center stage. Perhaps then, our beloved companions will thrive—not just as showpieces but as vibrant, healthy beings. In the words of Mark Derr, who penned "The Politics of Dogs" in 1990, we must avoid creating a Frankenstein monster—a breed shaped solely by human desires. Let us honor tradition while embracing evolution, ensuring that every wagging tail tells a tale of resilience, not compromise. Note: This essay reflects the intricate dance between passion, politics, and paws—a dance that continues to shape the world of dog shows.
  • 1
    • I have seen breeders are puppy peddlers that breed excessive size dogs. Telling people that they’re are supposed to be that big influence the public as well as judges. The dog was too big to perform the function that it was created to do. It couldn’t even jump into the back of a pickup. I think that is sad 😢. But unfortunately that happens. Then you will see when this happens other breeders will begin to add more size to their stock in order to win dog shows and or to sell pups.

      • Additionally, I know a breede4 that has developed a reputation with the judges. My breeding stock is from him. If he is showing a dog whether his or one of mine that dog will win best of breed. He doesn't do anything special in showing a dog. He hasn't been to any training or learned any tricks, but he'll do well. Then there's was a woman that shows her mountain dog. Beautiful dog by the way. Again I don't know the breed standard. She showed my pup for me at another show. But this particular show. The judge saw her. He watched her her entire moment in the ring. I told the guys near me that she would get 1st place. She does know how to show a dog. She was knowledgeable about breed standards. But she will win because she is attractive. Just as I predicted. She was awarded 1st . No one else had a chance....smh

      Login or Join to comment.